All categories

3 years ago

Too much planning on the job can get in the way of enjoying things. true or false.

1 answer:

6 0

<span>This statement is true. Since it is impossible to eliminate all spontaneity in life, planning for every little thing is just not viable. There will always be an issue that pops up, which will only create more stress if not planned for. So, yes, too much planning on the job can get in the way of truly enjoying it.</span>

You might be interested in

Which of the following is a good example of inflation?

Ulleksa [173]

Answer:

D. It cost you $85 to gas up your car this month. But last month it only cost you $50.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Marketing managers can choose between three possible global ______, which range from selling the same product to introducing an

sergij07 [2.7K]

managers can choose between three possible global ______, which range from selling the same product to introducing an entirely new product

3 0

2 years ago

Kendra worked in a library in missouri processing books and getting them ready for the shelves. her work was recently taken over

Katarina [22]

This is an example of outsourcing, which is when domestic jobs are sent to countries overseas to take advantage of the lower costs.

6 0

3 years ago

On January 1, year 4, Purl Corp. purchased, as a long-term investment, $500,000 face value Shaw, Inc. 8% bonds for $456,200. The

Alla [95]

Answer:

$468,000

Explanation:

Since the bonds will be held to maturity and purchased at a discount, their value will increase as maturity approaches. On December 31, year 5, the bonds should be reported at $468,002 ≈ $468,000

investment balance = $456,200 + $5,620 (difference between interest receivable and interest revenue 2004) +$6,182 (difference between interest receivable and interest revenue 2005) = $468,002

interest receivable 2004 = $500,000 x 8% = $40,000

interest revenue 2004 = $456,200 x 10% = $45,620

difference 2004 = $45,620 - $40,000 = $5,620

interest receivable 2005 = $500,000 x 8% = $40,000

interest revenue 2005 = ($456,200 + $5,620) x 10% = $46,182

difference 2005 = $46,182 - $40,000 = $6,182

6 0

3 years ago

What is not typical of traditional costing systems?

charle [14.2K]

Answer: The options are given below:

A. Use of a single predetermined overhead rate.

B. Use of direct labor hours or direct labor cost to assign overhead.

C. Assumption of correlation between direct labor and incurrence of overhead cost.

D. Use of multiple cost drivers to allocate overhead.

The correct option is D.

Explanation: The traditional costing system refers to the allocation of factory overhead to products, and this is based on the total amount of production resources that have been consumed.

When using the traditional costing system, the overhead is usually applied based on either the total number of direct labor hours consumed or the total number of machine hours used.

The traditional costing systems treat overhead costs as a single pool of indirect costs. Traditional costing is optimal when indirect costs are low when in comparison with direct costs.

7 0

3 years ago