Answer:
c. $25,000
Explanation:
Calculation to determine At the end of the year, the company's equity totaled:
First step is to calculate the Net income using this formula
Net income= Revenues- Expense
Let plug in the formula
Net income= 35000-23000
Net income=12000
Second step is to calculate Net income added to capital using this formula
Net income added to capital = Net income-Cash dividend
Let plug in the formula
Net income added to capital=12000-2000
Net income added to capital=10000
Now let determine the Ending company total equity using this formula
Ending company total equity= Opening invested capital + Net income added to capital
Let plug in the formula
Ending company total equity=15000+10000
Ending company total equity=$25000
Therefore At the end of the year, the company's equity totaled:$25,000
Answer and Explanation:
The accounting equation effects of each required adjustment is shown below:-
Transactions Assets
a. Prepaid rent - $1,280
b. Accumulated
depreciation - $1,180
c. NE
d. NE
Transactions = Liabilities + Stockholders' Equity
a. NE Rent expenses -$1,280
b. NE Depreciation expenses -$1,180
c. Accounts payable + $8,200 Utilities expenses -$8,200
d. Income tax payable + $310 Income tax expense -$310
Market Research
Explanation:
In a global business, <u>The firm often goes into uncharted territories for themselves and takes heavy risks in places unknown to them.</u> In such a situation market research done right is the best thing a firm can hope for apart from all other things.
A market not suitable for their products will simply not be beneficial no matter how everything else works out.
For example,<u> McDonald's setting up operations in India made its menu suit the Indian taste pallet and was able to carve out a market share</u> while other food chains were not as quick to do it.
Answer:
Part of the model: thinking can be taught, thinking is an active transaction between the individual and the data, the process of thought evolves by a sequence that is lawful.
Answer: Patton will sue QC industries for tortious interference with a contract
Explanation:
Since there has been a contract which had already been signed, then if QC industries damages Patton Company's image, Patton will sue QC industries for tortious interference with a contract.
Tortious interference, is also refered to as the intentional interference with a contract and this occurs when the business relationship or contract that one has with a third party is intentionally damaged by another person. In this case, QC intentionally damages Patton's contract and therefore, Patton will sue QC industries for tortious interference with a contract.