Answer: What are a few factors that contributed to the inevitable downfall of the Ottoman Empire.
*or something like that*
Answer:
The Pullman Strike and Loewe Vs Lawlor
Explanation:
The Pullman Strike was an organised strike by the American Railway Union against the Pullman Company. The strike closed off many of the nations railroad traffic. Workers of the Pullman company had gone on strike in response to a reduction in wages and when this was unsuccessful, they increased their efforts and with the help of the AFU took it nationwide. They refused to couple or move any train that carried a Pullman car. At its peak the strike included 250,000 workers in 27 states.The federal government's response was to obtain an injunction against the union and to order them to stop interfering with trains. When they refused, President Cleveland sent in the army to stop strikers from interfering with the trains. Violence broke out and the strike collapsed. The leaders were sentenced to prison and the ARU dissolved.
Loewe V Lawlor was a Supreme Court decision that went against the rights of the labour movement. D. E. Loewe & Company had been subjected to a strike and a boycott as a result of it becoming an 'open shop'. The nationwide boycott was supported by the American Federation of Labor and persuaded retailers, wholesalers and customers not to buy from Loewe. This boycott cost him a large amount of money and he sued the union for violating the Sherman Antitrust Act (Another piece of legislation subsequently used to attack unions).
The case was sent to the US Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut, which found that the lawsuit was out of the scope of the Sherman Act. However, upon appeal it then went to the Supreme Court, who ruled in favour of Loewe. The courts decision was important for two reasons. Firstly it allowed individual unionists to be held personally responsible for damages arising from the activities of their unions. Secondly, it effectively outlawed secondary boycott (Where members of different companies boycott in solidarity with the affected workers) as a violation of the Sherman Act. Both of these limited the ability of the unions to bring about change through striking and boycott.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/13463190#readmore
Answer:
The sponsorship of the court and wealthy merchants prevents artistic freedom from works of art, as they often sponsored works that painted them as religious figures, or in religious scenes.
Explanation:
Sponsorship was very important for the development of art during the Renaissance. However, this sponsorship often prevented artists' creativity and artistic freedom, as it prevented them from painting what they wanted, but made them paint portraits of their sponsors as historical figures, or religious figures. This characteristic reinforces the adoption of humanist concepts by artists of the time.
i believe it is B) unalienable rights force the government to place no restrictions on liberty.
Muhammad's agricultural reform made favorable and unfavorable results for the farmers. However, it did some positive effects in the end.
To get separated from the Ottoman Empire, he did some drastic changes. He forced farmers to work and took their farm lands. He profited from it and gave more pay to the farmers. After improving agriculture, he opened of industries where he can create military weapons. He supported more industries in his power and educated Egyptians.
Improving agriculture made opportunities to build and improve industries. To be more successful he invested in education and let his people be experts by gaining different skills learn. This helped him with his other more reforms.
