The green data point at June 2011 shows a proportional change of about________ , which means that the native fish population____
____ by about_______ percent when 95 percent of the lionfish was removed. In contrast, the orange data point at June 2011 shows a proportional change of about_________ , which means that the native fish population_______ by about________ percent when only a quarter of the lionfish were removed. Fill the blanks with below mention information.
Answer: The appropriate information that will be used to fill the blanks includes the following respectively:
-1.7
- increased
-70%
- 0.5
- decreased
- 50%
Explanation:
The green (topmost) data point at June 2011 shows a proportional change of about 1.7, which means that the native fish population INCREASED by about 70 percent when 95 percent of the lionfish were removed. In contrast, the orange data point at June 2011 shows a proportional change of about 0.5, which means that the native fish population DECREASED by about 50 percent when only a quarter of the lionfish were removed (a result that was almost the same as when none of the lionfish were removed).
The native fishes are being haunted by the lion fish, from the results, removing just few of the invasive lion fish will not make a difference. In other to help the native fish survive, many of the lion fish has to be removed.
About 110 million years ago, labyrinthodonts ( maze-toothed), a group of extinct amphibians. They were evolved from lobed-finned fish in the Devonian period. They were dominant animals in the rift valley was present at that time between Antarctica and Australia.
Answer: This is because animals (like humans) have more organelles to store in our bodies than bacteria. This makes sense because without all of our organelles we wouldn't be able to function properly. This is just another one of those form=function things.
