Answer:
Wacos
Explanation:
because it is apart of the group
Answer:
C i think i am not really sure but try
Explanation:
The correct answer is Universal conduct, based on Universal values
Happiness is the state in which a rational being is found in the world for whom, in all his existence, everything goes according to his desire and will; consequently, it presupposes the agreement of nature with all the ends of this being, and simultaneously with the essential foundation of determining its will. Now the moral law, as a law of freedom, obliges by means of foundations of determination, which must be entirely independent of nature and its agreement with our faculty of desire (as an engine). However, the rational agent that acts in the world is not simultaneously the cause of the world and of nature itself. Thus, in the moral law, there is no basis for a necessary connection between morality and happiness, provided with it, in a being that, being part of the world, depends on it; this being, precisely for this reason, cannot voluntarily be the cause of this nature nor, as far as happiness is concerned, make it, by its own strength, perfectly coincide with its own practical principles.
Answer:
contingency
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various psychologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is an example of a contingency existing between hitting his little brother and losing his television privileges. This term refers to a future event that is possible but cannot be predicted with certainty. In this situation that event is losing TV privileges.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
