Answer:
This belief is called Anti-science.
Explanation:
Anti-science is an ideology adopted by a person or institution, which defends incorrect interests as superior to science, discredits research and scientific discoveries and still places science as something vile, contradictory and incompetent that creates more problems than solutions, making people unhappy, weak and sick.
1. The idea behind the concept of multiple intelligences is that human intelligence can take different "modalities," as opposed to being dominated by a single general ability. I think this is a valid construct, as it approaches the concept of "intelligence" from various different angles, not always considered when discussing intelligence in other contexts.
2. As we do not have access to this text, we are not able to answer this section of the question.
3. One way in which the developers of a test of multiple intelligences could demonstrate the validity of the test using evidence would be by also researching the behaviour of the people who took the test out in the real world. They could compare these results to the results of the test. In this way, they would be more likely to find out whether the intelligences mentioned in the test are indeed exercised in real life.
4. A passage from the Bible that could support this idea would be the following:
<em>1 Corinthians 12:12-14 – "Just as a body, though one, has many parts, but all its many parts form one body, so it is with Christ. For we were all baptised by one Spirit so as to form one body—whether Jews or Gentiles, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink. Even so the body is not made up of one part but of many."</em>
In this passage, the idea of many parts within a single body is presented. However, it is also stated that the many parts of the body in fact end up forming a single entity. This is similar to the multiple intelligences that combine to give a single personality capable of certain things.
Answer:
im smart :)
jk im in the medium smart range
Explanation:
Answer:
National level : President
State level : Governor
Local level : Mayor
Explanation:
The leader of the executive branch has the power to enforce the laws that created by the legislative branch.
President has the highest authority in enforcing laws that affected the whole nation (such forming relationships with other countries, Federal tax, etc)
The governor has the highest authority in enforcing the law that affected the state (such as state tax income, legalities of a certain product, etc)
The Mayor has the highest authority in enforcing law that affected the local (such as allocating budgets to build local infrastructures or education curriculum)
Answer: A. In extreme cases when the potential damage is clear and irreparable
Explanation: Hazardous materials that cause harm to the environment are regulated by laws, each of which is targeted at particular problems.
A concerned citizen has the right, granted by both state and federal laws, to sue any individual or organization responsible for a form of pollution to halt the activity causing the pollution.
In extreme cases and where there is evidence that the pollution will cause clear and irreparable damage, a judge may halt the action causing the pollution before a violation of the law has been proven in court.
