Answer:
B) Faulty stimulus control.
Explanation:
This term is a psychological term which directly explains when a target behaviour is seen to come under the restriction control of certain irrelevant stimulus that are tagged to be antecedent. It sometimes forms a description of situations in which a behavior is triggered by the presence or absence of some stimulus. This is easily seen when a person loves to always eats when watching TV, then (in the operant conditioning use of the term) eating behavior is controlled by the stimulus of watching TV. Also some certain behaviors of lab animals are easily brought under control of such stimuli, and that is where the concept of stimulus control originated. Therefore, in this case, a lot of behavior is controlled by signals, which are antecedents to behavior, not consequences.
That statement is true
These researchers believe that after gathering both qualitative and quantitative data and put them into analysis, it will essentially produce similar results in the end. But they failed to consider that both of these data had their own strength and weakness (for example qualitative data tend to be really subjective and less accurate)
being on twitter all day and not getting anything done!!! we love to see it
C. platelet
platelets makes scabs
I believe the answer is: <span>disequilibrium
According to piaget, </span><span>disequilibrium happens because of a certain amount of imbalance between what we understood and what we encountered.
In order to restore the balance in this situation, Bonnie should be constantly exposed to the stimulus that disrupt her pre-existing belief.</span>
