Answer:
D) The Soviet economy was a tremendous success story; the USSR would still be together if it were not for the ethnic differences.
Explanation:
The Soviet economy was not a tremendous success, in fact, it was in many aspects a failure (although it was a success in some fields).
The other 3, true statements in the question give us a clue why:
The Soviet system benefited the center (Russia) disproportionally, leaving aside the other, peripheral republics in Central Asia, the Caucasus, The Baltics, and Eastern Europe, which were often very poor.
The Soviet system used a planned economy, instead of a market economy, and this led to many errors in the production of goods and services. Resources were often poured in unprofitable industries over more profitable ones, and the geographical location of the economic sectors often did not make sense.
Things that in a market system would likely not happen, ocurred in the soviet planned economy because the planners did not realize their mistakes.
I know that this is correct because I live in Michigan. The capital is Lansing, it was moved from Detroit when it collapsed. Plz mark brainliest, I need it to rank up!
Answer: The first one is Benito Mussolini
Explanation: And, I can't figure out the rest because of how you worded it or how you pasted it.
<span>Stereotype threat is more
likely to affect those who are high achievers because high achievers are prone
to greater expectations than low achievers. Since expectations are bigger,
whenever high achievers fail, they feel more unworthy of the expectation
towards the people.</span>
