Answer:
Southern farmers could not keep up with demands for cotton.
Explanation:
Southern farmers could not keep up with demands for cotton so they improvised by using tobacco instead.
Answer:
It's possible to assume that women who study STEM topics with a low proportion of females have successfully overcome barriers in school and the family, making them less prone to stereotypic views, and influences. The present study focuses on these kinds of factors and analyzes to which degree family factors, school-related factors, and individual stereotypes may influence a woman's academic self-concept. The following study presents a latent regression model which is based on a survey of 296 women from different German universities, all of whom are part of STEM programs of study that have <30% females. It was investigated to which degree individual stereotypes, support in school, and family support contribute to the self-concept in STEM. Gender stereotypes were negatively related to students' STEM-specific self-concept in the selected sample. This study also reveals negative family-related influences that lower a woman's self-
Explanation:
please mark me as brainlist please I
Answer:
Warren, is the right answer.
Explanation:
The period in the history of the United States when Earl Warren served as the Chief Justice of the U.S. came to be recognized as the Warren Court. He succeeded Fred M. Vinson in the year 1953 and worked on the post until 1969. This period is recognized as one of the most impactful periods in the history of American constitutional law. The Warren Court enhanced the power of the judiciary and the federal government as well as the civil rights and civil liberties.
Appellate jurisdiction means that the Court has the authority to review the decisions of lower courts. The United States district courts are the trial courts of the federal court system. This is where federal cases are tried, where witnesses testify, and federal juries serve. There are 94 federal district courts in the United States. Most of the cases the Supreme Court hears are appeals from lower courts.
I think it's necessary. We live in a society in the process of building a democracy accessible to all people. Like every process, we are subject to failure. The justice system has been questioned by social movements about their decisions, often considered unfair. In this way, the possibility of appealing to a new analysis of the case is important so that some decisions are reviewed.
Answer:
The answer is A. Citadel
Hope this helps, good luck :)
