Creo que te falta información posiblemente la imagen de la finca
Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
Answer:
y=4x-5
Step-by-step explanation:
y-y1=m(x-x1)
y-3=4(x-2)
y=4x-8+3
y=4x-5
Please mark me as Brainliest if you're satisfied with the answer.
Answer:
x=cfdg
Step-by-step explanation: