The question is incomplete. The complete question is :
Jaina and Tomas compare their compound interest accounts to see how much they will have in the accounts after three years. They substitute their values shown below into the compound interest formula. Compound Interest Accounts Name Principal Interest Rate Number of Years Compounded Jaina $300 7% 3 Once a year Tomas $400 4% 3 Once a year. Which pair of equations would correctly calculate their compound interests?
Solution :
It is given that Jaina and Tomas wants to open an account by depositing a principal amount for a period of 3 years and wanted to calculate the amount they will have using the compound interest formula.
<u>So for Jiana</u> :
Principal, P = $300
Rate of interest, r = 7%
Time, t = 3
Compounded yearly
Therefore, using compound interest formula, we get



<u>Now for Tomas </u>:
Principal, P = $400
Rate of interest, r = 4%
Time, t = 3
Compounded yearly
Therefore, using compound interest formula, we get



Therefore, the pair of equations that would correctly calculate the compound interests for Jaina is
.
And the pair of equations that would correctly calculate the compound interests for Tomas is
.
Let's start by rationalizing the radical:
4√6/√50 * √50/√50
This gets rid of the radical in the denominator, giving us:
4√300/50
√300 can be simplified to √3 * √100 or 10√3. Now we can insert this back into the numerator:
4 * 10√3/50
This is equivalent to:
40√3/50
40/50 can be simplified to 4/5.
Therefore, the answer is 4√3/5.
Beacuse <span>A square by definition is a "plane figure having four equal sides." Rectangles' sides are not equal and hence cannot be a square.
A rectangle by definition is a "four-sided plane figure with 4 right angles" - which also implies that a square can be a rectangle because it is also a four-sided plane figure with 4 right angles...... hope this helps</span>
1 foot is 12 inches. So just divide 81 by 12.
81/12 = 6.75
So your answer is 6.75 feet.
-4 < x < 6 is ur compound inequality