Answer:
The expected return on a portfolio is 14.30%
Explanation:
CAPM : It is used to described the risk of various types of securities which is invested to get a better return. Mainly it is deals in financial assets.
For computing the expected rate of return of a portfolio , the following formula is used which is shown below:
Under the Capital Asset Pricing Model, The expected rate of return is equals to
= Risk free rate + Beta × (Market portfolio risk of return - risk free rate)
= 8% + 0.7 × (17% - 8%)
= 8% + 0.7 × 9%
= 8% + 6.3%
= 14.30%
The risk free rate is also known as zero beta portfolio so we use the value in risk free rate also.
Hence, the expected return on a portfolio is 14.30%
For both accepting and rejecting, thank the employer for the wonderful opportunity that was given. When accepting state that you are happy with the employment terms, and the salary that was given. When rejecting tell the employer thank you, but simply state how there may have been better opportunities, or how the job was not the right fit for you. Both should be done either by email or phone.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Although the business segments related to waste management and information systems may seem irrelevant at start, these two are often intertwined.
In order to successfully forecast the future of waste prevention and management, managers should take into consideration IS and their benefits. For example, how can a new IS that is scheduled for implementation next year affect the existing, real-time waste management system? Can the existing process be automatized and simplified with the aid of the IS?
Therefore, it is needed to include the IS aspect in the waste prevention policy review.
Answer: bribery and conflict of interest
Explanation: In simple words, bribery refers to the act under which one individual tries to persuade the behavior of another individual for his benefit by offering him or her monetary benefits.
Whereas, conflict of interest refers to a situation when someone has the authority to make decisions that benefits himself more than the entity he is working for.
Hence we can conclude that the above case depicts bribery and conflict of interest.
