Answer:
Bagley's ethical decision tree
Explanation:
Is the proposed action legal? If yes, does the proposed action maximize shareholder value? If yes, is the proposed action ethical? If no, would it be ethical not to take the proposed action? These are four questions that managers of all organizations should ask when confronted with a decision on an action according to Bagley's ethical decision tree
Bagley's ethical decision tree is mostly used on making ethical decision, it says a decision tree can be used to make the right choices and ultimately do the right thing especially in a situation where there is no obvious right or wrong decision but rather a right or wrong answer.
Answer:
[B] Only State A and State B can take action against Bill.
Explanation:
This is because the whole details of the transaction took place between State A and State B. This is why the states involved can take action against Bill. If not, then all the States would have had the right to take action against Bill.
This analysis validates that Only State A and State B would be able to take action against Bill.
The symbolic interaction approach clarifies that individuals demonstration towards circumstances in view of the way they see them. On the off chance that an occupation or family is imperative they will do as well as can be expected in those social examples.
<span>Symbolic interactionism is a sociological point of view which created around the center of the twentieth century and that keeps on being persuasive in a few ranges of the teaching. It is especially critical in miniaturized scale human science and social brain research.</span>
<span>The answer is "Physical" </span>development.
The term lifespan development<span> alludes
to age-related variations that happen from birth, all through an individual's
life, into and amid old age. The six phases of lifespan development<span> are: Infancy,
Childhood, Adolescence, Early Adulthood, Middle Age, Older Age. Infancy.</span></span>
Fun fact: Life span<span> is the most extreme time a man can live, though life
expectancy<span> is the
normal time a man will live, in view of elements like sexual orientation and
birth year. </span></span>
Answer:
To support any claim, we need evidence that is in favor. And they are the arguments and explanations that best supports the claim. And those which does not supports the claim, leave the claim uncertain. And different debates will have a different list of evidence and reasons which support, and also a list that does not support the claim. Hence, first find the issue, which is the claim, and then find out what supports and what does not support the claim. And then you can put your words forward. That is the correct way to participate in a healthy debate. Remember, you should either support the claim, or you should be against the claim. And you will have to stick to it till the very end, supporting it with your thoughts and evidence that you can collect while preparing for the debate. The better you prepare, the healthier it is going to be the debate. And you should never be 50-50. You should either agree or disagree. Like if you are debating on climate change, you can either support it or not support it. The bushfire in Australia is a fact that supports, and you can pick it up if you are supporting, and economic loss is a fact that does not support it. You can pick that fact if you do not support it. The point is, you should put forward strong facts, And that makes a debate healthier.
Explanation:
Please check the answer.
