Answer:
true it have to be true yeah
1. abeg
2. dbac
3. resurrected, Trinity, prefect, church, baptized, Messiah
4. c
5. i dont get it
6. D
7. gcfa
8. Pliny the Elder, and Seneca
Answer:
Nausea
Explanation:
Jean Paul Sartre was a french philosopher and writer who is considered one of the main existentialists from the twentieth century.
His philosophy is based on the statement that "humans are condemned to be free" meaning that we are thrown into this world with no specific purpose and yet are free to choose our whole lives (something that is intrinsic to existence).
He also stated that our lives are meaningless and pointless since we are all going to die at the end. He wrote a novel called "The nausea" in which the main character, at some point <u>understands the pointlessness of his own life and this creates him psychological pain and nausea</u>. This novel is one of the most classic ones from the Existentialist school.
Therefore, Sartre uses the term nausea to denote the psychological pain one feels upon authentically believing that everything is pointless.
Answer:
b. Expand territories
Explanation:
One of the great objectives of colonization and exploitation was to promote the extension of territories, making a kingdom richer, since the extension of dominated lands allowed the exploration to be more comprehensive, and could generate wealth that would be used to develop the kingdom and make it more powerful and bigger.
Answer:
Albert Bandura proposed the social-cognitive perspective on personality, which emphasizes the interaction of people with their environment. To describe the interacting influences of behavior, thoughts, and environment, he used the term reciprocal determinism.
Explanation:
Albert Bandura's social-cognitive theory states that there is a mutual and continuous interaction between a person's behavior, the environment, and personal factors (mainly cognition). These three constitute the basis for his reciprocal determinism, which affirms that these factors are constantly influencing one another as they interact. Before this theory, children were seen as passive recipients of influences from the environment, which would mean they were absolutely moldable. To Bandura, even though the environment can exert influence over behavior, behavior and cognition can also influence the environment.