The answer is <em>me. </em>
According to the symbolic interactionism perspective, developed by George Herbert Mead, the me is the part of our identity that corresponds to how whe think other people see us. It is the part of the identity that is a product of socialization and it begins in early childhood.
Withing this me, expectations and attitudes of society are also internalized, as a way of knowing what is expected of us.
If Jessica keeps on paying all the bills and does something special by spending money on her stuff, then Paul might get sad and feel uncomfortable and guilty.
Money is often the root cause of couples drifting away from each other. If only one partner spends all the money and the other is incapable of doing so, then they may feel offended at times, and this can cause some rift between them which can affect their relationship negatively. It is very important for the partners to share the bills or contribute proportionally to their income. It can reduce misunderstandings too and hence bring positivity between them. Equity theory focuses on determining whether the distribution of resources is fair to both relational partners in a rational manner. It also suggests that employee motivation at work is driven largely by their sense of fairness and proportion. It simply focuses on the idea that both inputs and outcomes of any exchange process should be proportional in nature.
Learn more about Equity theory at:
brainly.com/question/3771927
#SPJ4
Temperatures in heavily populated South Asia will exceed habitable levels by the end of this century without efforts to stem manmade climate change, according to new research.
Researchers behind the study, published in the journal Science Advances, found that 4% percent of the South Asian population is expected to experience temperature and humidity conditions in which humans cannot survive without air conditioning by 2100. Three quarters of the population will experience environmental conditions considered dangerous, even if not downright unlivable.
<u>Answer:
</u>
The headline is an example of the conflict caused by states administering elections while federal law protects voting rights.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Different states have different requirements for the voters to be eligible for voting, but the federal laws unequivocally grant voting rights to everyone above eighteen years of age.
- The conduct and operations of elections are in the hands of the executive, but they do not have the right to modify the rules set for the conduct of elections by the United States Constitution.
- This disparity gives rise to conflict between the state machineries and federal laws.
B, the lender lost money, but Nancy did not.
