I think both, my reasons are, first, we have more technology and better transportation that will help us, like the technology to take and give to others, and the cars and trains ect. to help us to get from one place to another a bit quicker. Also i think worse because of the green house causes, the cars,oil,and other things we use in our everyday life is slowly ruining the planet, ecosystem ect. there are downsides and upsides to both.
Explanation:
<em>let</em><em> </em><em>AB</em><em> </em><em>be</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>deck</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>CD</em><em> </em><em>be</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>hill</em><em> </em>
the industry a set of offerings belongs to.
Answer:
The circular flow model shows the interaction between two groups of economic decision-makers―households and businesses―and two types of economic markets―the market for resources and the market for goods and services.
Answer:
The answer to this question is c. Kathy has to pay based on a quasi contract.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario displayed above Kathy has to pay based on a quasi contract.
A Quasi contract is a contract that is created by a court order, not by an agreement made by the parties to the contract. For example, quasi contracts are created by the court when no official agreement exists between the parties, in disputes over payments for goods or services
In this case there has not been an official agreement between Kathy and the hospital, However she has to pay the bill presented to her based on Quasi contract which is created to prevent an individual to be unjustly enriched or from benefiting from the situation when he/she does not deserve to do so.
Hence the answer is c. Kathy has to pay based on a quasi contract.
