Answer: The presence of asymmetric information
Explanation: In simple words, asymmetric information refers to the situation when one party to a contract have extra information regarding a subject than the other party of the contract.
Asymmetric information creates the potential of misconduct from the leading party as they can easily cheat the other party by concealing that important information.
In the given case, Mr. Smith was aware that his laptop is not working properly but still he sold its to a customer who was not aware of it. Thus, we can conclude that the correct option is C.
Explanation:
Persuasive message:
- Cordial, positive communication, with a focus on negotiation and openness to receiving proposals and feedbacks.
- Indirect approach, with a focus on explaining the advantages and benefits of the public to perform the expected action such as performing a specific task or concluding a sale.
Deliver bad news in business:
- Be transparent and communicate all the reasons that led the organization to face the bad news that is being communicated, maintaining a realistic but positive approach to maintain the sense of unity and overcoming of employees.
- Using an indirect approach so that bad news has less impact on the audience, for this the communication is made using soothing words and the news is in fact only given at the end of the message when explanations of the reasons for the fact are explained which increases the employees' sense of understanding.
Answer: Loving and accpeting myself for who I am
Explanation:
We live in a world where is hard to fill like you are accepted or up to society's "standards" overtime I have come to love who i am and appreicate myself its taken alot of effort and trust in myself which is why i feel its my proudest accomplishment! :))
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
Answer: Option C
Explanation: In a monopolistic competition market structure, there are many producers selling their products and each product is not a perfect substitute of the other.
The number of producers are large but each operate at a relatively smaller level. The products offered in the market are similar but not identical.
Hence, from the above explanation we can conclude that option C is correct.