Answer:
The investigador should: Discuss the pros and cons of both the investigational drug and the commercially available drug and then allow the subject to decide whether to withdraw from the research to take the new drug.
Explanation:
An investigator's ethical duty, is to keep the subject of investigation, well informed with all the details about the invesigation. At a phase 2 of the study the subject suposposedly has been informed of the prosedure, following the informed consent. So in this particular case the investigator has to present all the new information so the subject can decide for himself what is best for him.
During phase II of an investigation, it is necessary to evaluate the benefits or negative aspects of a drug, to ensure the safty and wellbeing of the subject. If a drog is known to harm a subject, the procedure would stop. In this phase is important to have the data to decide and discuss what is best for the subject.
Answer:
Medyo natitiyak kong hindi iyon isang sagot sa pagpipilian ng pagpipilian. Kailangan mo talagang gawin ang mga hakbang na iyon upang makumpleto ang takdang-aralin..
Explanation:
Answer:
C
A brainliest would be appreciated
Answer:
Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778) was an Age of Enlightenment French philosopher and writer.
Explanation:
- He claimed we were inherently good but tainted by social evils.
- We are raised in a stable and genetically good condition.
- He published the Social Contract, stating that "Man was born free, but he's in chains everywhere."
- He claimed that individuals should have a common desire or will, and what's beneficial to society and the whole world.
- Rousseau wrote Emile, he based it the on natural education values.
- Some individuals believed that people were evil, that they were not inherently evil, but that they could be transformed into evil.
It is 12 weeks sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
