Lolsldjdhdhwhdhhdgdgegdydgd
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "with." You sell T-shirts in a market with price controls, where you charge the equilibrium price. The equilibrium price is already the best selling price that you can impose to a certain product.
Answer:
The answer is: What would happen if no cotton was furnished for three years? I will not stop to depict what every one can imagine, but this is certain: England would topple headlong and carry the whole civilized world with her, save the South.
Explanation:
Firstly, we have the main idea and topic in this passage is “Cotton” and “war”, also we can call them main words, as thanks to them, they give us a prompt as to what is the passage about. So these lines written in the answer space, are the main argument, because it mentions in different words what might happen if no cotton was provided during a period of time and also explains with solid arguments why.
Based on the given sentence above, the function of the noun clause is as the DIRECT OBJECT. A direct object is a noun that directly receives the action of the main verb in the sentence. In this sentence, the noun clause directly receives the action of the verb "learned". Hope this answers your question.
