Answer:
Louis Philippe was liberal.
Explanation:
Answer:
The best answer to the question: How much if this did Kyler contribute and how much of this is interest, would be: 93.311.43 would be the total amount accrued by Kyler at the end of the 25 years of saving if the annual compound rate is maintained at 6.2%, and the rest would be the net savings done by Kyler if he maintains the rate of savings at 225 per month for all of the 25 years.
Explanation:
The good thing about savings on an account with compound interest rate is that at the end of the saving period, the total amount gained will be much larger than without it. This compound interest rate is simply the extra money that a person may get for literally investing his/her money in this case on a bank account that offers that rate of interest every year. Give or take a bit from taxes, at the end of the day, Kyler got a lot more money from just compound annual interest, than from his own hand.
Answer:
This is a philosophical approach, it must be taken into account that in ethical theory there is a large number of moral coincidences, such as: it is wrong to steal and its universality, in ethical theories. But there are also many differences between ethical theories, one very important and which divides them into two types, are the Materialist ethical theories and those that are not. Materialistic ethical theories are those that in general tell us what we must do to achieve good and to be good, that is, they are content ethics pursues a series of ethical norms about what we must do, they condition the rules or norms to persecuted objects.
In the ethical theories indicated there are differences, those of materialistic tendencies: first: the tendency of divine command very similar to the naturalistic theory of Saint Thomas, which defends the good with the approach to a supreme God and follows the law of divine origin . Second: DJMill's utilitarianism good is the pleasure or absence of pain and is achieved through pleasure actions. Now it is pointed out that Kantism (non-materialist) corresponds to being a formal ethic whose author was Kant, defends good with the only morally good, a good intention and seeks to achieve good in the imperative, categorical, acts in a way that he can wish without contradiction , points out that the maxim is taken as a universal law. Kantina's law is called formal and comes before material ethics.
The last one i hope this helps
