Answer: Option 1. is correct
Explanation:
From the given options, <em>Past performance</em> is a variable that doesn't influences chances.
The mere notion that drives this analysis is that circumstances are controlled by an equilibrium between variables that control change and several other which tend to resist change. In order for the change to take place, the variables must be bolstered or on the other hand the resisting variables should be weakened.
I will help If you answer this one thing. Are yuou a K12 student?
Explanation:
A
I guess the answer could be
Answer: Dissenting Opinion
-----
Usually when decision is written, justices can write a concurring opinion if they would like to add something to the decision or if they agree with the decision, but disagrees with the reasoning. On the other hand, if they do not agree with the majority (aka the decision), they can write a dissenting opinion.
The southern delegates to the Constitutional Convention were willing to accept the Three-Fifths Compromise because it increased the political influence of the South.
<h3>What is the Three-fifths compromise?</h3>
By the Three-fifths compromise, the Northern and Southern state's delegates at the United States Constitutional Convention of 1787 agreed that three-fifth of the population of slaves would be counted in determining representation and number of seats in the Congress.
It also would determine how much each state would pay in taxes.
The three-fifths compromise allowed Southern states more Representatives and more presidential electoral votes than if slaves had not been counted although slaves had no voting rights.
Therefore, the Three-fifths compromise increased the political influence of the South by granting them more representation and electoral power.
Read more about southern delegates accepting the three-fifths compromise at brainly.com/question/7663707
#SPJ1
