<span>This statistic as cited is not credible and could be outdated. She just specified a percentage that she could have made up on her own to prove her point. She needs to indicate the source she obtained her information from and when the results for poverty percentage were obtained.</span>
Answer:
D). Ate a varied diet of plants and meat.
Explanation:
Pre-historic hunter-gatherers 'ate a varied diet of plants and meat' as they were dependent on plenty of sources for obtaining their food. They obtained their food by pursuing various activities like 'hunting, gathering/collecting wild herbs and edibles, scavenging, fishing, etc.' Their sole dependence on the abundance of nature made them eat various sources of food until the advent of agriculture 12k years ago. Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
A developmentalist who is studying the popularity of children's names over the years is actually looking at the <u>cohort</u> effect.
<h3>What is a psychological experiment?</h3>
A psychological experiment can be defined as a scientific investigation which typically involves the process of manipulating an independent variable (the cause), so as to determine or measure the dependent variable (the effect) and understand the relationship between the human mind and behaviors.
<h3>What is an
cohort effect?</h3>
A cohort effect can be defined as a scientific investigation which occurs when a research result is influenced by the characteristics of the cohorts such as children's names, that are being studied.
In conclusion, a developmentalist who is studying the popularity of children's names over the years is actually looking at the cohort effect.
Read more on cohort effect here: brainly.com/question/28269513
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
A developmentalist is studying the popularity of children's names over the years. She is really looking at the _____ effect.
naming
cohort
Hawthorne
generational
Answer: Weaker
Explanation:
Jaunice daughters tantrum appeared weaker than they were before this is due to the fact that they didn't persist for a full day entering the next day. If they appeared stronger, they would have persisted despite not be paid attention to. If the situation persists, it might likely become weaker and weaker and there is a possibility it would stop in the future due to attention not shown to it.
