Answer: Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
There is a adjustment entry for depreciation of $3,545 but the amount that is debited as depreciation expense is different from the amount that is credited as accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation Expense A/C Dr. $3,454
To Accumulated Depreciation $3,545
This will lead to an unequal adjusted trial balance.
Option 'A' and 'B' has no effect on the adjusted trail balance to be unequal because whole transaction is omitted.
Option 'D' also has no effect on adjusted trail balance because the debit and credit amount will still match.
Your answer is:
It is too difficult to compete with major retailers like Target and Best Buy.
When a lot of people buy things from a store, there is a lot of turbulence in many stores, espeically in big retailers. The answer will be It is too difficult to compete with major retailers like Target and Best Buy.
Best of Luck!
Answer: Please refer to Explanation.
Explanation:
Two Companies. We shall call them A and B.
If A and B decide not to advertise, they both get $5,000,000.
If A advertises and B does not then A captures $3 million from B at a cost of $2 million meaning their payoff would be,
= 5 million - 2 million + 3 million
= $6 million.
A will have $6 million and B will have $2 million as $3 million was captured from them. This scenario holds true if B is the one that advertises and A does not.
If both of them Advertise, they both reduce their gains by $2 million while capturing $3 million from each other so they'll essentially both have just $3 million if they both decide to advertise.
With the above scenarios, it is better for both companies to ADVERTISE if there is NO COLLUSION. This is because it ensures that they do not get the lowest payoff of $2 million if the other company decides to advertise and they do not.
However, if they DO COLLUDE. They must both decide that NONE of them SHOULD ADVERTISE and this would leave them with their original $5 million each which is a higher payoff than the $3 million they will both receive if they were both advertising.
Answer: No, this was merely Carl's opinion.
Explanation:
Labelling a statement as an opinion generally protects the person who said it from defamation suits however this is not always the case.
If the opinion is based on disclosed and well known facts, the action is free of defamatory or libel charges.
This seems to be the case in this scenario as his column seems to be based on the performances for the year.
Bottomline is, Stella cannot sue Carl for libel as it is his opinion.
Answer:
a.
Explanation:
XSGFKXHIUHDIHGDAOUYGGAOGOAIGHuihifdughoispuhgihgaph
