I think it would be generic brand
Lamar's experience demonstrates retroactive interference.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
When a person tries to recall some information that are older in nature and comes to know about some recent information it refers to Retroactive interference. For instance you may call the name of your grandmother with the name of your mom. There will be a retroactive interference with the two names.
This happens when you forget some tasks that are learnt in past because of the learning of new tasks. In the given example, Lamar only rememnbers the names of the people in the first group and remebers the profession of the last women met by him. His experience demonstrates retroactive interference.
You should respect the adults and be very professional around them. Don't act immature or goofing around otherwise you'll get fired
Amount invested in both schemes is $45,000
returns in investment g is 75,000 in 6 years.
yearly return is:
75000/6=12,500
returns in investment h is 105,000 in 9 years
yearly return is:
105,000/9
=11,666.67
from the above results we can conclude that investment g has the higher returns.
Answer: Increased profit as opposed to making them internally.
Explanation:
Make or buy decisions are management decisions as to whether production components should be produced internally or outsourced.
Buy decision
Unit price= $34
Total unites= 19900
Total cost= $34*19900=$676,600
Make decision
$
Direct materials 178,000
Direct Labor. 380,000
Variable overhead. 104,000
Relevant fixed overhead 260,000
Total $922,000
Unit price for make=922000/19900
Unit price=$46.33
Since buying outside is more cheaper than producing internally, it will be more profitable to outsource(buy).