Given:
The sine function is:
To find:
The frequency of the graph of given function.
Solution:
If a sine function is defined as:
Then, the frequency of the sine function is:
We have,
Here, 
. So, the frequency of the given function is:
Therefore, the correct option is D.
Answer:
b= -8
Step-by-step explanation:
we have: 3y +12 = 6x <=> y + 4 = 2x <=> y= 2x - 4
=> 2y=4x + b
<=> 2(2x-4) = 4x +b
<=> 4x - 8= 4x +b
<=> b = -8
Answer:
x = 12
y = 22
Total amount = $2596
Step-by-step explanation:
First let's find the value of each deposit until the 10th in relation to x and y:
1st: x
2nd: y
3rd: x + y
4th: x + 2y
5th: 2x + 3y
6th: 3x + 5y
7th: 5x + 8y
8th: 8x + 13y
9th: 13x + 21y
10th: 21x + 34y
Now, we can write a system with two equations and two variables:
2x + 3y = 90
21x + 34y = 1000
From the first equation: x = (90 - 3y)/2
Using this value of x in the second equation, we have:
21*(90 - 3y)/2 + 34y = 1000
945 - 31.5y + 34y = 1000
2.5y = 55
y = 22
Now we can find x:
x = (90 - 3*22)/2 = 12
Now, summing all the deposits, we have a total of 55x + 88y, which is equal to 55*12 + 88*22 = $2596
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
4=y/8+1
rewrite equation
y/8 + 1 = 4
move all terms not containing y to the right of the equation
y/8 = 3
multiply both sides of the equation by 8
8 x y/8 = 8 x 3
simplify both sides of the equation.
y = 24
Answer:
Internal validity
Step-by-step explanation:
The internal validity here is weak
Internal validity describes the extent to which an evidence weighs the cause and effect claim. In this study, the internal validity that brought about failure in the new exam is mainly due to the environment where the exam was written and not the new exam itself.
So this validity is weak in claiming that the new exam is not a good substitute for the old exam.
Putting them in the same good environment might help the researchers to draw a better conclusion.
