Answer:
D. rise
Explanation:
D. As per the study, marginal product theory suggests that, as the marginal product of capital (MPK) increases even if the capital stock is fixed or unchanged, the real rental will also be changed the same way i.e. it will rise in this given scenario.
Answer:
$4062
Explanation:
base salary of $1,200
+ 6% of each sale
so $1,200 + $390 + $619.20 + $42 + $70.80 + $1,740
=$4062
Answer:
13.86%
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the flotation-adjusted (net) cost of its new common stock
Using this formula
Cost of new common stock(re) = [d1 / stock price (1-flotation cost)] +g
Let plug in the formula
Cost of new common stock(re)= [$1.36 / 33.35 (1 – 0.065)]+0.094
Cost of new common stock(re)= [$1.36 / 33.35 (0.935)]+0.094
Cost of new common stock(re)= [$1.36/31.182)+0.094
Cost of new common stock(re)=0.04361+0.094
Cost of new common stock(re)=0.1376*100
Cost of new common stock(re)=13.76%
Therefore the flotation-adjusted (net) cost of its new common stock will be 13.76%
Answer:
b. $233,100 tax expense
Explanation:
The computation of the current income tax expense or benefit is shown below:
But before that first we have to need to find out the taxable income i.e
= Pretak book income + increase in net reserve warranties + exceeded amount - dividend deduction
= $1,000,000 + $25,000 + $100,000 - $15,000
= $1,110,000
Now to find out the current income tax expense since the tax rate is not given so we assume the marginal tax rate i.e 21%
So,
= $1,110,000 ×21%
= $233,100
By multiplying the taxable income with the tax rate we can get the income tax expense
Answer:
a. The total profit would be positively affected as it increases
Explanation:
1. We calculate the value of revenue per 8000 gallons with the initial chemical compound and processed into the new variant
Revenue Initial Chemical Compound= 8000 gallons X ($52/gallon)
Revenue Initial Chemical Compound=<em><u> $ 416.000</u></em>
Revenue Chemical compound processed into the new variant=8000 gallons X ($83/gallon)
Revenue Chemical compound processed into the new variant= <u><em>$ 664.000</em></u>
2. If we consider that the other production costs will be the same for the two chemical compounds, then the only difference will be the processing cost to refine the basic compound into the new variant. For this reason, we substract only the value of processing the basic compound into the new variant for the revenue of this.
<u><em>$ 664.000 - $160.000= $504.000</em></u>
3. The benefit values for each case are:
Initial Chemical Compound: $416.000
Chemical compound processed into the new variant: $504.000
In conclusion, greater benefit is obtained by processing the basic compound in the new variant than if the basic compound were sold only
