Answer:
The correct answer is 0.4%.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the computation for the given data are as follows:
If no debt, then required return can be calculated by using following formula:
Required return ( no debt) = Risk free rate + Unlevered Beta × Market risk premium
= 6% + 1 × 4%
= 0.06 + 0.04
= 0.10 or 10%
If debt, then required return can be calculated by using following formula:
Required return ( with debt) = Risk free rate + levered Beta × Market risk premium
= 6% + 1.1 × 4%
= 0.06 + 0.044
= 0.104 or 10.4%
So, extra premium required = 10.4% - 10% = 0.4%
Answer:
cash 750 debit
note receivable 510 credit
NSF check 240 credit
-- to record increases of cash from reconciliation --
bank fees expense 44 debit
cash 44 credit
-- to record decreases of cash from reconciliation --
Explanation:
cash account 5,600
bank fees (44)
NSF 240
bank collected 510
adjusted cash: 6,306
We adjust based on the unknow information for the company like fees, collection and NFS found. we could also adjust for mistake but for this time, there isn't any.
Answer:
D) is 20% above expectations.
Explanation:
The Augusta Division was supposed to earn a net profit of $1,000,000 (= $2,000,000 - $1,000,000). Since the division's manager and his/her team were able to cut reduce fixed costs to $900,000 and increase contribution margin to $2,100,000 (either by increasing selling price or reducing variable costs), then the division earned a net profit of $1,200,000 (= $2,100,000 - $900,000). This net profit is 20% higher than expected, therefore the manager's (and his/her team's) overall performance was 20% above expectations.
Answer: <em><u>16.5% is the average tax rate that will result in a 10 percent increase in tax revenues.</u></em>
Explanation:
This is an example of static forecasting since no time parameter is involved.
Now,
Let initial revenue be "R" ,
"n" be no. of taxpayer
∴ R= 65000×0.15×n
R +0.1R= 65000×rate×n
Using the above two equation, we'll get ;
<u><em>r = 16.5%</em></u>
Answer:
The GDP price index for 1984 using 2005 as the base year was 80%
Explanation:
The GDP price index:
X/100 = $16/$20
X = 80%
Therefore, The GDP price index for 1984 using 2005 as the base year was 80%
