Answer:
C. not change, and the price received by sellers will not change.
Explanation:
Because previously there was a tax of the same ammoutn nothing will change. The sellers will will transfer the tax into the price therefore, the after-tax proceeds will not change netiher the selling price. The same effect of the consumer tax will occur again, some or the entire tax will be pay for the seller or the consumer based on the elasticity of the supply and demand curve.
The effect of chaging the law will not alter the economic reality of translate taxes into consumers
Answer:
Income Tax Expense (Dr.) $49,080,000
Deferred Tax Liability (Cr.) $49,080,000
Explanation:
Income tax expense = ( Taxable Income for the year + building and equipment taxable amount + Prepaid Insurance - Liability or contingency Loss ) * Tax rate
Income Tax expense = ( $117,000,000 + $14,700,000 + $2,300,000 - $11,300,000) * 40%
Income Tax expense = $49,080,000
Answer:
Disruptive innovation.
Explanation:
Disruptive innovation is one that creates the way a market operates, that is it creates a new market and disrupts the old one. Existing firms and products are displaced.
In this instance when Futura Inc. introduced an automobile that could run completely on electricity for longer periods of time than any other electronic or hybrid automobile, it introduced a product that will cause disruptions in the current automobile industry.
Although there was challenges of frequent repairs, this was eventually resolved.
Answer:
$2960 yearly savings
Explanation:
From the values given and from mathematical manipulation, he or she needs a contribution of at least $2900 every year in order to achieve his goal of $50,000.
EXPLANATION
- If the child is 5yr old now, in 13years time, she will be 18yr old.
- for the next 13years, it would have amount to $38350
- remember the bank will give an annual interest rate of 2%
- so for 13years, that's 26% = 0.26
- In the 13th year, he would have saved $38350, add the 26% interest for the duration of 13years = 26% x $38350 + $38350 = $48321
- His savings will fall between $2950 - $2960 yearly.
Answer:
D : All options are correct
Explanation:
- The marginal buyer is the essence of demand curve while marginal seller is essence of supply curve.
- @ Q = 500 units, Selling Price is set at SP = $35
- @ Q = 500 units, Buying Price is set at BP = $40
- Since, SP ≠ BP our equilibrium price would be $ 37.5 assuming the price elasticity of demand and supply are equal. In any case the equilibrium price would lie in between [ 35 , 40 ] such that to prevent a shortage of units in near future.
- Moreover, if the seller decides to sell at price $35 then he must sell goods greater than 500 units to reach the equilibrium profits. However, it could also lead to excess of units or surplus.
- We see that from selling the goods at SP = $35 while the buyer is willing to pay BP = $40 for 500 goods, the seller would be under-profiting and would be earning $5*500 = $2,500 less than he would at equilibrium price of $40 and selling units greater than 500. Hence, 500 goods is not an efficient quantity of goods.
