Answer:
in the past our survival instincts were higher and we were likely more adapted to require less water, nowadays we tend to rely on water more as well as the accessibility of it, an example of this dependability is when snow or cold temperatures cause the water to freeze leaving people with a shortage of water, this affects people greatly, much more than it would have in the past likely
Answer:
ya 50 percent prayer or keeping trust on god person will change .50 percent hardworking and your patience and will power helps in changing person
Explanation:
I think you will get some idea by this☺️
Answer:True ,this is the strength of the weak ties
Explanation:Weak ties refers to those people we are not so close with like a stranger you meet at a restaurant and they hear your conversation about looking for a job and they approach you about an available offer in their company, this person has strengthened the weak ties because eventhough you are not that close to them but their reference has given you a great opportunity. The strength of weak ties then means getting help from a stranger just like Martha couldn't get any help from her family but an old classmate was able to help her eventhough they don't have an ly close ties.
The second most spoken language would be Spanish
Answer:
<h3>I think this might help you</h3><h3>
Explanation:</h3><h3 />
<h3>With the flu season swiftly approaching and the H1N1 already affecting large numbers across the world, New Hampshire faces the possibility of a flu epidemic. In such an instance, what action would the state or federal government take? The possibility of a massive quarantine gets thrown around every time a flu epidemic exists, but is such an action an infringement of the rights of individuals living in a free nation? Or is the common good of preventing the spread of infection more important?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>Even the current health care debate reflects the tension between individual rights and the common good. Over the past months New Hampshire town halls have been crowded with individuals taking a side in the individual rights/common good debate. Some have expressed the view that health care initiatives are in the interest of a healthier state and nation. Others claim that compulsory health insurance impedes individuals’ right to the best health care money can buy. Can the individual rights vs. common good debate help us understand some of the ideological tension behind the current health care discussion?
</h3><h3>
</h3><h3>As many of these examples show, this month’s question is largely political, but it can also flow into other areas of thought. There’s the philosophical and moral question of the Donner Party; if you and five others were stranded and starving, and your only hope of getting out alive is to eat the first member who passed away, would you do it to save the rest of the group? There is the question that comes up around the disabled. Do you build special infrastructure to accommodate the few who are disabled even if that meant the cost to do this would jack up prices. Then there is the commercial/environmental side. What is more important, buying a cheaper car that fits your personal budget and your personal tastes or a more expensive and efficient auto that would help save the environment? What do you think?
</h3>
