Answer:
The Dawes Plan/ Young Plan helped Germany to start to rebuild after WW1.
Explanation:
Dawes: The Dawes Plan (as proposed by the Dawes Committee, chaired by Charles G. Dawes) was a plan in 1924 that successfully resolved the issue of World War I reparations that Germany had to pay. It ended a crisis in European diplomacy following World War I and the Treaty of Versailles.
The plan provided for an end to the Allied occupation, and a staggered payment plan for Germany's payment of war reparations. Because the Plan resolved a serious international crisis, Dawes shared the Nobel Peace Prize in 1925 for his work.
It was an interim measure and proved unworkable. The Young Plan was adopted in 1929 to replace it. (from wiki article on Dawes Plan)
Young Plan:The Young Plan was a program for settling Germany's World War I reparations written in August 1929 and formally adopted in 1930. It was presented by the committee headed (1929–30) by American industrialist Owen D. Young, creator and ex-first chairman of the Radio Corporation of America (RCA), who, at the time, concurrently served on the board of trustees of the Rockefeller Foundation, and also had been one of the representatives involved in a previous war-reparations restructuring arrangement—the Dawes Plan of 1924. The Inter-Allied Reparations Commission established the German reparation sum at a theoretical total of 132 billion, but a practical total of 50 billion gold marks. After the Dawes Plan was put into operation in 1924, it became apparent that Germany would not willingly[citation needed] meet the annual payments over an indefinite period of time.[citation needed] The Young Plan reduced further payments by about 20 percent. Although the theoretical total was 112 billion Gold Marks, equivalent to US ca. $27 billion in 1929 (US$ 119 billion in 2020) over a period of 58 years,[1] which would end in 1988, few expected the plan to last for much more than a decade.[2] In addition, the Young Plan divided the annual payment, set at two billion Gold Marks, US $473 million, into two components: one unconditional part, equal to one third of the sum, and a postponable part, equal to the remaining two-thirds, which would incur interest and be financed by a consortium of American investment banks coordinated by J.P. Morgan & Co. (wiki article on young plan)
Externalities - An externality is such type of outcome which is not directly incureed by the producer but its consequences are incurred by society as a whole. The externalities can be negative as well as positive.
Negative externality- A externality that has a negative and harmful effect on society, as well as firms, are called negative externalities.
- For eg., A firm polluting the environment to save the cost of production will have negative consequences on society as a whole.
Positive externality - An outcome of the decisions and execution of a company that has led to positive consequences for both company and the society.
- For eg., the perfect example of positive externalities is the research and development work of any company. The research and development benefits not only the company to enhance its efficiency but it also benefits society by gaining the knowledge from the research, employment from work, etc,
To learn more about externalities please click on the link brainly.com/question/16968584
#SPJ1
For the answer to the question above, t<span>he rejection of the league of nations, the higher tariffs imposed by the or deny-cucumber act and the emergency quota act all point to America's desire of isolationism during the early 1920's.
</span>The American foreign policy of Isolationism in the 1920's<span> was a diplomatic and economic doctrine that aimed at self-advancement to make the United States economically self-reliant and retaining peace with other nations.</span>
The correct answer is C) They were women who boycotted British goods, instead, producing the goods they needed at home.
The statement that BEST explains who the Daughters of Liberty were and the role they played in the American Revolution is "They were women who boycotted British goods, instead, producing the goods they needed at home."
All American colonists participated in the claim for liberty and independence. Men formed the Sons of Liberty. Women formed the Daughters of Liberty. This female group was formed to protest against heavy taxation from the British crown. They were angry when the English imposed the Townshend Acts of 1767, that charged taxes for imports such as lead, tea, glass, and paper. They always supported the Patriotic cause.
Answer:
Marbury v. Madison is important because it established the power of judicial review for the U.S. Supreme Court and lower federal courts with respect to the Constitution and eventually for parallel state courts with respect to state constitutions.
Explanation:
