<h2>
Answer:</h2>
The answer that best links the relationship between Nixon's "Silent Majority" Speech and Vietnamization is <u>C) Nixon's "Silent Majority" speech endeared across America as the President who wanted to end the war in Vietnam abruptly</u>.
<h2>
Explanation:</h2>
On 3rd November 1969, when it had roughly been only 20 months of Richard Nixon becoming the President of the United States, he addressed all the Americans by taking to national television and delivering a speech.
He demanded to silent Americans to voice their opinions so that he can take steps to end the war going on in Vietnam. The speech referred to the people in from old generation and some of the young people served in Vietnam War.
Governments typically had been either unitary or confederated. Or another way to say that is that they either focused on centralized power (in someone like a king) or particularized power -- the power in the parts of a kingdom rather than at the center.
So, for instance, in France (prior to its Revolution), all the power in the kingdom centered in the hands of the king. For 175 years, they didn't even have a meeting of the Estates General which was their version of a representative body. And the power of nobles on their lands was reduced while the king's power grew.
Meanwhile, in the German territories, there was a loose confederation called the Holy Roman Empire. One of the kings or princes held the title of "emperor," but he really had no imperial power. The confederated German states retained control over their own kingdoms or territories.
The American experiment mixed something of the best of both approaches. There would be strong central power in the federal government, but putting checks and balances on that power by retaining certain aspects of control in the hands of the states within the union.
Answer:
Explanation:
By establishing in Marbury v. Madison the Supreme Court as the final interpreter of the Constitution, Marshall's Court established the Supreme Court's ability to overrule Congress, the president, state governments, and lower courts.
Answer:
The Treaty of Paris, which ended World War 1, actually played a large part in setting the stage for World War 2. Humiliated in defeat, crushed by debilitating war reparation payments, and angered by the war guilt clause, Germany came out of the war a truly weak nation.
Explanation:
Answer:
Yay a subject based off my favorite war. The Blitzkrieg attacks or strategy was a strategy used by the germans to gain surprised advantages against its enemies. The way it was used was by using heavily amored and stocked tanks to use surpreme force against the enemy ensuring a fast a steady victory. Basically going all out on someone. Yes and No it wasn't succesful because the americans figured out their plan before it was proven to be a problem.
Explanation:
