Based on the SAS congruence criterion, the statement that best describes Angie's statement is:
Two triangles having two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles do not necessarily meet the SAS congruence criterion, therefore Angie is incorrect.
<h3 /><h3>What is congruency?</h3>
The Side-Angle-Side Congruence Theorem (SAS) defines two triangles to be congruent to each other if the included angle and two sides of one is congruent to the included angle and corresponding two sides of the other triangle.
An included angle is found between two sides that are under consideration.
See image attached below that demonstrates two triangles that are congruent by the SAS Congruence Theorem.
Thus, two triangles having two pairs of corresponding sides and one pair of corresponding angles that are congruent to each other is not enough justification for proving that the two triangles are congruent based on the SAS Congruence Theorem.
The one pair of corresponding angles that are congruent MUST be "INCLUDED ANGLES".
Therefore, based on the SAS congruence criterion, the statement that best describes Angie's statement is:
Two triangles having two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles do not necessarily meet the SAS congruence criterion, therefore Angie is incorrect.
Learn more about congruency at
brainly.com/question/14418374
#SPJ1
Answer:
3q/2
Step-by-step explanation:
3p+3q=p
2p=-3q
p=-3q/2
Answer:
Rs 8500
Step-by-step explanation:
For a cost price of c, the marked price is ...
marked = c +25%·c = 1.25c
After the 15% discount, the sale price will be ...
s = marked -15%·marked = 0.85·marked = (0.85)(1.25c) = 1.0625c
The profit will be the difference between the sale price s and the cost c:
p = s -c
500 = (1.0625c) -c = 0.0625c
Then the cost is ...
500/0.0625 = c = 8000
and the sale price is ...
s = c +p = 8000 +500 = 8500 . . . rupees
The selling price will be Rs 8500.
The answer is 30%.... because 50/65 is .3
X=5
Measure of angle BCA= 55
Measure of angle B= 76