1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MrMuchimi
3 years ago
5

Aggravated assault with a deadly weapon florida

Law
1 answer:
sergiy2304 [10]3 years ago
3 0
Threading to cause serious bodily harm with a deadly weapon such as a knife bat or anything other weapon that can kill
You might be interested in
¿Qué relación existe entre la Revolución Mexicana y la industria del petróleo?
adelina 88 [10]

Proceeds to rob your house

4 0
3 years ago
Why there is no point to find the truth?
Colt1911 [192]

Answer:

most people take the lie to be the truth and therefore the idea of searching for the truth does not even arise.

For the one who can see the lie for what it is, the search for the truth is no longer necessary. The truth reveals itself by simply rejecting the lie. The entire search for the truth was in fact an effort of demasking of the lie masquerading as the truth.

4 0
3 years ago
What questions would you ask about the stolen evidence?
kondor19780726 [428]
What time did this approximately happen
8 0
2 years ago
Evidence collected in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECP
Scorpion4ik [409]

Answer:

Exclusionary Rule.

Explanation:

The exclusionary rule is a legal rule of the constitution that prevents any illegal search and seizure of 'evidence' that is collected in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution. It also prevents the presentation of such 'evidence' in a court of law.

This rule also states that any evidence collected in violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) may not be admissible in a court of law as legal evidence as it is 'seized' in violation of the person's constitutional rights. The Fourth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution prevents the government from doing any search or seizure of 'evidence' of a person's home without due reasonable reason. Thus, it prevents a person's from being forcefully searched. So, when such searches are done and evidence produced before the court, they are not admissible under the exclusionary rule.

7 0
4 years ago
60 POINTS!!!!!!!!!! Do you think Judges are truly independent of any political party?
atroni [7]
I hope it right good luck

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the best definition of federalism?
    10·1 answer
  • Explain why it is sometimes nessessery to limit rights
    10·1 answer
  • Of a license is defined as a formal action to terminate a license
    7·1 answer
  • What can care providers do to encourage good eating habits
    5·2 answers
  • If a company uses the percent of receivables method to estimate uncollectible accounts, the company will first determine the req
    7·1 answer
  • Compare valid, void, voidable, and unenforceable contracts. Give a brief definition of each
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a true statement? Members of the House of Representatives serve four-year terms. The number of senator
    8·1 answer
  • An individual wants to sue an agency in a federal court to stop its action. Rank the actions they can take from first to last, p
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the idea behind a war metaphor, such as "War on Crime"?
    8·1 answer
  • Long text (essay)
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!