Answer is:
It includes points in quadrant II and it doesnt include points in quadrant I
Explanation:
For odd functions a rule is:
f(x) = -f(-x) or in other words
f(x) + f(-x) = 0
Because of this function can be in quadrants I and III or in quadrants II and IV as in pairs...
The first and last choices are true.
The problem deals with fractions comparison, lets do it:
21/30 > 2/3
we begin solving:
21 > (2/3)*30
21 > 2*10
<span>21 > 20
</span>therefore the proposed inequality is true, <span>21/30 > 2/3
You can solve as well getting same denominator for both fractions and comparing directly, in this case we need to get 2/3 to be divided by 30:
2/3 = (10/10)(2/3) = 20/30
So we have:
</span><span>21/30 > 2/3
</span>which is equal to:
<span>21/30 > 20/30
</span>and we compare directly because both fractions are divided by the same number, and we can see that the inequality is true.
Answer:
Last answer choice
Step-by-step explanation:
The AAS congruence theorem uses two adjacent angles, followed by a side length on the side (not in between the angles.) Therefore, the first answer is ruled out (because it deals with angles and not sides), and the second answer is ruled out because it involves side lengths between angles. LP=MO may be true, but it does not compare the two triangles that we are interested in. However, the last answer choice is correct, because a midpoint divides a line exactly in half, meaning that both halves are the same length and therefore congruent. Therefore, the last answer choice is correct. Hope this helps!
Answer:
-4m-3
Step-by-step explanation:
-0.25 times 16 is the same thing as dividing 16 by -4. 16m divided by -4 is -4m
-0.25 times 12 is the same thing as dividing 12 by -4. 12 divided by -4 is -3