They dont like them and feel like they are tyrants
1.- These 3 arrangements differ from each other, since the Amalgamation, is the mixture of different things, they may be cultures or races, the Assimilation is the process of adaptation of the immigrant to the receiving society. This acquires the culture and customs of the adoption community, disappearing their status as "different". To the extent that the immigrant adopts the culture of receiving society, this will admit you as one more member, producing its full integration. This theory has been strongly criticized, from the ethical point of view, but also by believing that the immigrant will adapt to the new culture, independently of its origin, race or religion. And Pluralism refers to the dominant trend is that neither natives nor immigrants want to lose their identity, and adaptation would occur through the adherence of all, to common principles of coexistence , being able to maintain at certain levels the cultural characteristics of each group and as long as the conflicts that may arise do not affect these basic principles of coexistence, which are those that confer a sense of community and avoid social fragmentation. The most common stereotypes are: Americans, Latins, African Americans, Chinese, they will be more or less frequent depending on the city where you live, Latins are a common stereotype in the northern United States, and I do not think they are harmful to any group, The harmfulness of something or someone does not come from their race, or stereotyping.2.- In my country we experience the 3 arrangements, amalgamation, assimilation and pluralism, nowadays, thanks to globalization, we experience all 3 in many countries of the world, in almost all countries there is a mixture of races and customs derived from foreign citizens, in many of them foreigners adapt so much to the culture that they are inserted very quickly assimilating it as their own, and in many others the different cultures struggle to maintain their origin and customs, giving way to pluralization.
Answer: There movement kind-off help them exercise and there ideas make the society a better place. The effect off the movement makes them have less food cause they can't carry all there foods to where they are moving to.
Explanation: Well if you move a lot you burn lots of calories and if they come up with an idea they tell the king and him might like or not like it. And if they move a lot they will have less food cause you can't carry all the food you have.
By the way I am 12.
Answer:
True
Explanation:The Sarbanes-Oxley Act is specifically enacted for the public corporations,it helps to prevent and put fraudulent activities in check,it was enacted following several corporate fraudulent scandals that occured between the year 2000 to 2002.
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT PUTS BASIC ETHICAL STANDARDS IN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND REPORTING IN PUBLIC CORPORATIONS AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IS CODIFIED INTO THE LAWS OF THE LAND.
The arrows that are pointing in the wrong direction is e is pointing the wrong way
