Answer:
The answer you put is correct.
Explanation:
A
Answer:
But a civic responsibility is stressed as a socially good behavior to perform. Examples of civic responsibility include voting in elections, signing up for the military, volunteering in the community, participating in government politics, and holding public office.
Answer:
A follower of structural-functionalism would look at the college classroom as an institution, and try to find what holds it together. He would analyze tertiary education is an important factor in today's society, and why college classroom s are the means to access tertiary education.
A follower of the conflict perspective would look at the conflicts between professor and students, or among the students themselves, and how those conflict shape social relationships in the classroom.
A follower of symbolic interactionism would look at the symbols in the classroom, and how students and professors relate to them, or in other words, what those symbols mean to them.
Answer:
New France is all the land in North America - from up into Canada down to new Orleans - that the French claimed. From whom did French settlers first learn about the Mississippi River? ... When La Salle reached the mouth of the Mississippi, he shouted "long live the King!" and claimed the entire River valley for France.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
He compares the role of a supreme court justice to that of an umpire in baseball or a referee in football or hockey.
He says for example, that those neutrals would never favor a team for person reasons. A team would never get unfair treatment if they were in a do or die match and had not been in such a match for 50 or more years while their opponents had one this match multiple times. Such behavior would be unthinkable.
He stated that one must uphold the rules as given to him. The idea of a referee or umpire falls apart a little here, but a supreme court justice is not obligated to uphold rules which are unconstitutional. His job is to fairly judge what should be decided. It does not matter what his own thoughts on abortion might be: he must rule on what the constitution would say about such matters.
Sometimes it is not always easy.
