The rhetorical device that is most clearly used here is:
<h3>What is ethos?</h3>
Ethos is a rhetorical device that refers to the credibility of a person to speak on a subject. In the passage above, the speaker mentions some factors that make him qualified to speak on the matter in question.
He has the academic qualifications and the requisite community involvement that provides the needed experience to complete the project. So, we can say that the ethos rhetorical device was used in this case.
Complete Question:
Read this excerpt from a students college application:
In addition to academic and extracurricular achievements in school, I am an involved member of my community. I volunteer at the local animal shelter every Saturday morning, and I help build houses for a nonprofit organization a few times a year with my family.
Which of these rhetorical devices is most clearly used here?
A.Text structure
B.Ethos
C.Parallelism
D.Inductive logic
Learn more about ethos here:
brainly.com/question/11868443
#SPJ1
As you may know, third person will use third person pronouns such as he, she, it, and they. When a story has a narration in the third person, the narrator will be talking about other people. First person narration is when the narrator speaks about himself or herself, and second person narration is when the narrator is speaking directly to the readers or someone in the story, which is indicated by the use of the pronoun “you.” That said, there are two types of third person—third person limited and third person omniscient. Third person limited is when the narrator knows the thoughts of just a single character which is usually the main character. Third person omniscient is when the narrator knows the thoughts of all the characters and pretty much everything about everything--all situations.
Answer:
The past tense version of "sing" is "sang", so it would change to "They sang a beautiful song".
<span>In Chapter Ten, the Director passes through the Centre’s Fertilizing room, admiring the fertilizing and decanting technologies. He andHenry Foster plan to meet Bernard in the Fertilizing Room. The Director tells Henry that Bernard must receive punishment because no one should lead the general population astray with strange behavior or notions of individuality. With all the workers present, the Director publicly reproaches Bernard for his social misconduct and tells him that he must go to Iceland where he will not be able to influence others.Bernard and the Director represent two sides of the novel’s main conflict, and this chapter describes their confrontation. The chapter opens with descriptions of the scientific mechanisms used to create humans. The Director states that no one, including Bernard, can express individuality in any way. The Centre can simply make a new individual if anyone gets out of line, which indicates the society’s reliance on science rather than human life.The Director's predicament in the chapter is an example of irony. The Director enters the room with a high regard for social programming and belief in the good of science, state regulation, and conformity in all social practices. However, the Director becomes the chief example of non-conformity when the others learn that he himself exhibited the most embarrassing behavior in society by fathering a child. The Director, who is normally responsible for the creation of life and ordering of class, is also responsible for a sexual act that goes against this dystopian society.</span>
You’re answer would be D love!
