1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
slavikrds [6]
3 years ago
11

Which of these is an instance of a court not having subject matter jurisdiction in a case?

History
1 answer:
amid [387]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A California family is arguing over how to deal with a house owned by the recently deceased parents and seek help from a family court in Los Angeles

Explanation:

For a court to solve a dispute, it must have jurisdiction over the subject of matter presented if not the judgment can be rendered void . The subject matter jurisdiction is the ability of a court to hear particular matters. For example the family court is to hear family related matters like divorce, adoptions e.t.c. The probate court handles matters concerning properties of a deceased person, juvenile court handles matters of underage and district court handles matters like bankruptcy, accidents, theft e.t.c.

A family court cannot handle cases arising from matters concerning properties of a dead person

You might be interested in
Compare divergent and convergent plate boundaries that have plates of the same density to
postnew [5]

Answer:

If the two plates are of equal density, they usually push up against each other, forming a mountain chain. If they are of unequal density, one plate usually sinks beneath the other in a subduction zone.

Explanation:

Convergent boundaries is where two plates (a continental plate and the ocean floor) get "pushed together" by subduction. If they have the same density, they will be pushed up together creating a mountain (the Himalaya's mountain is a great example). If the plates have different density then the one with more density overlaps the other.  

7 0
3 years ago
One of the original purposes of the Bill of Rights was to restrict the power of government over the lives of individuals. Please
adell [148]
T. This statement would be true because the bill of rights <span> helps make sure citizens' individual rights are being protected and not the government isn't able to override it's citizens and take their rights away.  </span>
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write a conversation between two colonists who disagree over Britain taxing the colonies to help pay off its debts from French a
Ivan

brainly.com/question/2209107?utm_source=android&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=question does this help?

8 0
3 years ago
What was one important achievement of the Greek empire
egoroff_w [7]

Answer:

I think B

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Why did minority groups receive limited benefits from progressivism?
Elodia [21]

Answer:

Many Progressives held racist ideas about minority groups.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • For the 1st time in history, what was put behind the war effory in the civil war?
    11·1 answer
  • How did geography shape the Arab way of life
    12·1 answer
  • How were Hideko Tojo and Adolf Hitler similar in the years before world war II
    12·1 answer
  • what term refers to a system in which one branch of government is prevented from seizing too much power
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following were issues facing the North as the war dragged on?
    6·1 answer
  • The _____ and their descendants known as the boers or Afrikaans settled in and arround the region of cape town South Africa
    11·1 answer
  • Which description of Total War as it applied to the American Civil War is accurate?
    12·1 answer
  • Whose job was it to limit the scarce items that anyone could buy?
    5·2 answers
  • Colonists founded Savannah because the site had
    7·2 answers
  • What social change did the American Revolution bring about regarding gender roles?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!