Hamilton believed that the federal government had powers to do whatever was "necessary and proper" in exercising leadership beyond its specifically enumerated powers.
A key example was Hamilton's argument for the creation of a national bank, which was not specifically stipulated by the Constitution. Hamilton's argument was based on the "necessary and proper" clause of Article I, Section 8, of the United States Constitution. After enumerating a number of the powers of Congress, including borrowing money, coining money, regulating commerce, etc, Section 8 of Article I closes with by saying Congress shall have power "to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."
Hamilton favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution -- in other words, that the Constitution allows for anything that is not strictly forbidden in what it has expressly stated. A national bank was not strictly listed as something Congress could establish, but there was nothing in the Constitution to prohibit it. And the "necessary and proper" clause gave leeway to create it.
Overall, Hamilton favored a stronger federal government than did some of his peers among the founding fathers.
The injustice was that 5 young black men were charged and arrested for a crime that they did not commit, even with the fact that there was virtually no concrete evidence that pointed to them.
The answer would be youthful, because the WW1 had just happened so people adresses life with a very relaxed attitude because so many people had died they realised how short life is and became more promiscuous in their day to day activities
Answer:
Sorry, but your answer is not a question and therefore, I cannot answer it. Please add something to make it a question. For example, is it a True or False question? IS the question incomplete?
