Answer: The second to last sentence
The problem boils down to money, but I am assuming you are looking for the causes of the problem.
<span>1. Social Security was never indexed correctly to accommodate the growing life expectancy on those drawing on it. The age at which you can collect should have changed in concert with the life expectancy of the population, or the amount of the benefits should have been decreased if they wanted to keep the age at which you receive it from keeping pace with lefe expectancy. </span>
<span>2. The growth in income inequality has led to vast amounts of money being earned by fewer people and the tax on social security has a limit so any income over the limit is not subject to the tax. Right now that cap is around 109k/year...so someone making 125k/year pays the same amount into social security as someone making 10 million a year. As more wealth is concentrated with fewer people, even vast increases in income and/or wealth yields little increase to the amount collected via the SS tax. </span>
<span>3. Not necessarily on the scale as 1 and 2 above but fraud is also a cause of the monetary shortfall. There are those that cheat the system. Every so often you will hear stories of people getting caught in social security fraud rings where they collect either through identity theft or other criminal means. You also have people that will collect when a relative passes away. They will purposely not report the death or provide invalid SS information so they will continue to receive the deceased person's benefits long after they have died. </span>
<span>As far as a solution, you are stuck with the eventuality of either decreasing benefits, raising the retirement age, or increasing the amount of taxes collected...none of which are likely to fly in Congress. Programs like SS rely on growing the base of people from which you are collecting, but at some point this does not happen. Population growth is not automatic and even with population growth, the concentration of income at the top percent of people offsets any such growth. It may be considered a very progressive/liberal thought, but eliminating the cap on income from which SS tax is collected would help. You can still keep the cap on SS benefits meaning the people at the top of the income ladder would be paying far more than they would get out of it in 10 lifetimes...but this would neutralize the income inequality impact on the system. To be honest, if there was an easy solution, we would have done it by now.</span>
Answer:
Savings
Explanation:
In this experiment, the subject learns the list of 20 numbers so that was associated with the recognition prospectus. Sarah took 15 words and learn those words repeated 15 times. After five days, she has forgotten the list and now Sarah has to return to re-learn pattern and recognition. When Sarah relearn the items numbers some of the numbers retrieved in the original form and some of the numbers have been repaired and recognized by the associations with others. After a few learning processes, the test has given again and it was found that there was a significant relationship between the number and its all dependent measurement. It was found that savings are a sensitive concept in relearning and some sub-threshold items exist. It was also found that the re-institution also play a vital role in savings effect in memory
I think it is B. 1950's, but that is just a guess so if I'm wrong then I'm sorry
Hope this helps. :)
Answer: the right answer is C. the covenants of seisin, right to convey, quiet enjoyment, warranty and further assurances.
Explanation:
Covenant of seisin denotes the legal possession of a feudal fiefdom or an state in land.
The Right to convey covenant means that the owner can sell or dispose of his or her property.
Quiet enjoyment refers to the right that the grantee or tenant has to undisturbed use and enjoyment of real property.
Warranty.- the grantor promises that owns the property and has the legal right to convey it.
Further assurances means that upon demand by the grantee the grantor will execute any documents necessary to fix any defects in the grantee's title.
