Order the numbers from least to greatest. -7/5, -1 5/11, -1.45, -1 91/200
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
p=1.2
Step-by-step explanation:
Additive inverse of any number means a number which can be added to the original number to get
Two numbers are said to be additive inverse of each other if sum of both numbers is 0. For example if 5 is the given number then -5 will be it's additive inverse. So to find additive inverse, we basically change the sign of number.
Given number p is additive inverse off -1.2 so p must be 1.2.
Sum will obviously be 0.
So to graph them on number line, we make a point at -1.2, 1.2 and at 0 for their sum.
Answer:
A), B) and D) are true
Step-by-step explanation:
A) We can prove it as follows:
B) When you compute the product Ax, the i-th component is the matrix of the i-th column of A with x, denote this by Ai x. Then, we have that . Now, the colums of A are orthonormal so we have that (Ai x)^2=x_i^2. Then
.
C) Consider . This set is orthogonal because
, but S is not orthonormal because the norm of (0,2) is 2≠1.
D) Let A be an orthogonal matrix in . Then the columns of A form an orthonormal set. We have that
. To see this, note than the component
of the product
is the dot product of the i-th row of
and the jth row of
. But the i-th row of
is equal to the i-th column of
. If i≠j, this product is equal to 0 (orthogonality) and if i=j this product is equal to 1 (the columns are unit vectors), then
E) Consider S={e_1,0}. S is orthogonal but is not linearly independent, because 0∈S.
In fact, every orthogonal set in R^n without zero vectors is linearly independent. Take a orthogonal set and suppose that there are coefficients a_i such that
. For any i, take the dot product with u_i in both sides of the equation. All product are zero except u_i·u_i=||u_i||. Then
then
.
Answer:
Table 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Check table three;
Since the left hand limit is not equal to the right hand limit
, the limit as x approaches to 2 does not exist.
Therefore "nonexistent" is true, and table 3 is the correct model of the limits of the function at x = 2