Technology, language, and writing were widely spread due to _____.

History

2 answers:

otez555 [7]3 years ago

8 0

I think it is migration i hope i helped

kkurt [141]3 years ago

3 0

Well, there can be three answers to this. Trade, migration, and expansion all played important roles in the spread of these things. When merchants traded, their cultures were spread, as they traded both products and information. Migration also played a role, since people migrated and then they adapted to the indigenous people's culture and the indigenous learned from them. Additionally, expansion played a role, because when people conquered other people, they forced them to accept their culture and eventually cultures mixed.

You might be interested in

Which statement Scott the three fifths compromise is accurate?

erastova [34]

Answer:

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a temporary solution to a long-term political issue.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Which describes the second Great Awakening of the early 1800s?

Fittoniya [83]

The Second Great Awakening of the early 1800s actually began around 1790 and was a religious awakening among Protestants. A new focus was put on faith and the rights of women and African Americans.

8 0

3 years ago

In the 15th century, China stopped trading with other areas of the world and became increasingly isolated. Which of these demons

yawa3891 [41]

Answer:

China took this action at the demand of Confucian scholars who were tired of barbarian contact.

Explanation:

What demonstrates that the China Isolation resulted from China's fear of cultural change is that "China took this action at the demand of Confucian scholars who were tired of barbarian contact."

The above statement is valid because, during this period, the Confucian scholars who were highly regarded considered the interactions with other people from other regions such as the Middle East and Europe to be savage and barbarians whose integration into their lifestyle or trading activities may corrupt their culture and ways of life.

6 0

3 years ago

Can primary sources be biased towards an event?

fredd [130]

Answer:

Yes.

Explanation:

Any source in History can be biased. It can be based on personal opinion, pressure, etc.

Let's take an example. Let's say we want to learn more about Hitler, and we have a primary source that we are analysing. The primary source is a diary entry from a Nazi propagandist, and in the diary entry he talks about how Hitler is like a reincarnation of God, he will lead Germany and the world to greatness and is all in all a great guy.

Straight away, you can tell that that is biased.

So to summarise, anything can be biased. It isn't related to what type of source it is. If you want to analyse and interpret sources, you will need to have lots of different primary and secondary sources at hand, and compare them to find the best answer and analysis.

Hope this helps

3 0

3 years ago

The American and British response to the Berlin blockade

Pachacha [2.7K]

C) give western-occupied sections of Berlin to the Soviet Union

8 0

3 years ago