Answer:
Explanation:
We are asked to find how many moles are in 4.8 × 10²³ fluorine atoms. We convert atoms to moles using Avogadro's Number or 6.022 × 10²³. This is the number of particles (atoms, molecules, formula units, etc.) in 1 mole of a substance. In this case, the particles are atoms of fluorine.
We will convert using dimensional analysis and set up a ratio using Avogadro's Number.
We are converting 4.8 × 10²³ fluorine atoms to moles, so we multiply the ratio by this number.
Flip the ratio so the units of atoms of fluorine cancel each other out.
Condense into 1 fraction.
Divide.
The original measurement of atoms has 2 significant figures, so our answer must have the same. For the number we found, that is the hundredths place. The 7 in the thousandths tells us to round the 9 in the hundredths place up to a 0. Then, we also have to round the 7 in the tenths place up to an 8.
4.8 × 10²³ fluorine atoms are equal to <u>0.80 moles of fluorine.</u>
Answer:
The temperature of the gas.
Explanation:
According to the kinetic molecular theory, the molecules of a substance are in constant random motion.
If an ideal gas is contained is a sealed rigid container, the average velocity of the gas molecules is dependent of the temperature of the gas.
Recall that temperature is defined as the average kinetic energy of the molecules of a body.
Answer : Amoxicillin Suspension 125 mg/ 5 ml is 125 mg of Amoxicillin per 5 ml of suspension is an example of weight to volume.
Explanation :
Weight by volume (w/v) means that the mass of solute present in 100 mL volume of solution.
Weight by weight (w/w) means that the mass of solute present in 100 gram of solution.
Volume by volume (v/v) means that the volume of solute present in 100 mL volume of solution.
As per question, amoxicillin suspension is, 125 mg/ 5 ml that means 125 mg of Amoxicillin present in 5 mL of suspension. So, it is an example of weight to volume.
Hence, it is an example of weight to volume.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Hypothesis have to be based on previous knowledge and have to be able to be tested but the problem is most hypothesis can’t be explained so it’s impossible to prove a hypothesis correct because science uses inductive reasoning
Sodium is very reactive but it’s a metal, and the problem asks specifically for a non-metal.
Silicone is technically reactive, but not super reactive.
Argon is a nonmetal, however it is an inert gas. It doesn’t react with anything.
We’re left with Chlorine, which is a non-metal in group 7, a highly reactive group, on the periodic table.
