The below statements are what I believe about removing Monuments
- Why are we moving them (AKA taking them down)?
Are we just moving it for room? Why are we moving it? For room, for a building, is that honorable? No, I don't think it is
- Are we really thinking about the monuments use
If were removing a monument that has a significant meaning or remembrance of something, than that's disrespectful and why did we put it up in the first place
- Do the people like it, or not?
This kind of relates to the first answer. Are we just moving it to put in a building or something like that. If the government has decided to remove it, are they thinking about if the people like it?
There are my answers. Best of luck,
- Ari -
The presidents salary is $400,000 us dollars plus benefits.
The answer is C because I remember this from when I did it when I was younger
The answers are profane and sacred. According to French
Sociologist, Emile Durkheim, Australian Aborigines separated their domain into
the profane or the scope of repetitive, average life, and the sacred or the
sphere endowed with divine significance. Aboriginal Australians or also known
as Australian Aborigines are a group of indigenous people found in the mainland
of Australia or the island of Tasmania.
Answer:
I personally think that Alexander the Great was better.
Explanation:
Although he didn't care much about the citizens he conquered many city states in a shorter amount of time then other kings could.
