The correct answer is A hasty generalization of the anecdotal evidence variety.
Explanation: In this case we can understand that the awards often do not evaluate certain areas that should be evaluated, this makes these awards not so valuable because in fact the possibilities in general are not fully explored.
Answer: Mitigation of damages
Explanation: The concept of Mitigation of damages defines the action an individual or party who has suffered or incurred a loss arising from a breach of contract should take in other to lessen or mitigate the effect of the contract breach. This will lessen or reduce the loss incurred as a result of the breach caused by the other party. Once there is a breach of contract, Mitigation of damages becomes a duty on the party who has suffered a loss and should therefore, prevent increased 'avoidable loss' caused by the contract breach. Further losses incurred has a result of failure to mitigate damages won't be catered for by the party guilty of the breach of contract.
yeah it's B.
20 characters needed to submit answer...
