Answer:
d. participant observation
Explanation:
Participant observation: In psychology, the term participant observation refers to the research method in which the researcher or the experimenter becomes an active participant in the same situation or group they are researching on.
The participant observation technique is a qualitative research method in which a researcher plays a role based on his or her interest of studying.
In the question above, Jarod is using participant observation as a method of gathering data.
Well half child and half devil. may mean that it looks harmless but its pretty bad and devil like such as evil but it depends on where the reference is from.
Local libraries are places people go to vote during elections.
Using a library computer you can look up information on the voting process. There are hundreds of sites with information. You could also speak with a librarian, library staff are full of wisdom and love being asked questions.
Watching the news during election time is very likely the most helpful way to learn everything about the election and its process.
Answer:
Isolates
Isolates are completely detached. They don't care about their leaders, know anything about them or respond to them in any obvious way. Their alienation is, nevertheless, of consequence. By default – by knowing nothing and doing nothing – isolates strengthen leaders who already have the upper hand.
Bystanders
Bystanders observe but do not participate. They make a deliberate decision to stand aside, disengaging from their leaders and the group. This withdrawal is, in effect, a declaration of neutrality that amounts to tacit support for the status quo.
Participants
Participants are in some way engaged. They clearly favor or oppose their leaders and the groups and organizations of which they are a part. In either case, they care enough to invest some of what they have (time, for example) to have an impact.
Activists
Activists feel strongly about their leaders, and they act accordingly. They are eager, energetic and engaged. Because they are heavily invested in people and process, they work hard on behalf of their leaders or to undermine and even unseat them.
Diehards
Diehards are prepared to die for their cause, whether that is an individual, an idea or both. Diehards are deeply devoted to their leaders or, in contrast, ready to remove them from positions of power, authority and influence by any means necessary. Diehards are defined by their dedication, including their willingness to risk life and limb. Being a diehard is all-consuming. It is who you are. It determines what you do.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is letter B, The commission mostly interviewed white families.
Explanation:
The Sibley Commission was an assembly made in order to gather people's viewpoints regarding desegregation in Georgia's schools. They needed to consider two options, <u>whether they'd rather close the public schools and prevent integration or allow the Federal Government to desentegrate the schools.</u>
It turned out as a result that many of the residents wanted to close the public schools rather than choosing integration. So, this means that the commission mostly interviewed the white families because many refused. If the black families were interviewed, I'm sure they'd want the white and black people to be integrated. Integration would mean equal benefits to the black.
Thus, this explains the answer.