Answer:A) There is no set of guidelines on how to take any potential disciplinary actions with disabled employees
Explanation:
The Absentee rates has no bearing on whether to hire Jay or not. Neither is a demand for higher performance based on the accommodations they will make for him. Employment Discrimination laws prevent organizations from discriminating against applicants based on their race, sex, disability, among other factors. Therefore, they cannot set a higher target for him than those set for workers without disabilities.
While option D would do more to encourage, than prevent Lulumelon from employing Jay, it is not factually correct. During recruitment, accommodations have to made to ensure that the workplace environment is as conducive to a worker with a disability as those without. These accommodations such as physical changes to ensure accessibility, changes to software and technology as well as policy changes can be substantial financially.
A valid reason for not employing Jay is the absence of a disciplinary procedure for people with disabilities in place. The company has to prepare for all possible events and consider what would happen if they had to take disciplinary measures against Jay, which is not available at the moment.
B is not the correct answer
Idek it's just asking me to help but someone said a I don't even read this but good job
Answer:
Type I error
Explanation:
Type I error is a statistical significance. It does not prove the correct result in a research hypothesis. Here the p-value is based on the probabilities.
In this phenomenon, there are always chances of making an incorrect conclusion. It is related to accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis.
In this research, there are another four options possibilities in which there are two correct and two incorrect error representation. These errors are inversely proportioned.
The answer is hindsight bias. It is a sense of humility regarding the accuracy of intuitions is most likely to be undermined. Hindsight bias is a time period used in psychology to give an explanation for the tendency of human beings to overestimate their potential to have anticipated a final results that couldn't probably be expected, it is able to lead a man or woman to believe that an occasion changed into more predictable than it really turned into, and may result in an oversimplification of reason and impact.