It was the academic community who <span>mostly agreed and backed the book's scientific research and evidence. Also the public opinion backed Carson's text. On the other hand, t</span>here was strong backlash <span>from the chemical industry for book's message. </span>DuPont, Velsicol Chemical Company<span>, and the </span>American Cyanamid<span> biochemist </span>Robert White-Stevens<span> and former Cyanamid chemist </span>Thomas Jukes<span> were amongst the aggressive critics of the research especially that it was attacking the chemicals that they were producing.</span>
I think you forgot to give the options along with the question. I am answering the question based on my knowledge and research. "<span>A significant number of people were hostile toward immigrants" is the one conclusion that could be drawn from this fact. I hope that this is the answer that has helped you.</span>
The working people of France were known by the name of Sans Culottes. They were the lower class common people of France during the 18th century. Among this group of people, number of them became militant and radical partisans during the time of French Revolution. The main reason was the poor condition of their life and living.
