All categories

3 years ago

Is morality always destined to be relative?

2 answers:

8 0

It depends how you look at it. We have laws and such built on moral principles, yet at the same time, people are slowly, but surely, starting to turn away from morals.

slavikrds [6]3 years ago

5 0

ANSWER:

Yes, morality is always destined to be relative.

EXPLANATION:

This is because moral judgments can be true or false relative to something.

In others words, there must be something present on which moral principles, ethics and judgement must be based in relation to something else.

Morality is also considered to be relative because there is no specific set of rules or moral ethics that the society is required to follow.

In fact, moral ethics are adapted as and when people feel the need for these in relation to some context or situation.

In other words, moral ethics come into play only in relation to something happening.

You might be interested in

What is the example of George Washington's death designed to show in the discussion of moral disagreement? a. Even an extremely

arlik [135]

The correct answer is C) People can disagree about what the right thing to do is without abandoning the idea that there is a right thing to do.

What is the example of George Washington's death designed to show in the discussion of moral disagreement?

Answer:

"People can disagree about what the right thing to do is without abandoning the idea that there is a right thing to do."

That is the importance of tolerance and respect with discussing any topic with another person that has a different point of view than yours.

Regarding George Washington, he made a lot of contributions to the new nations. He helped the Americans win the war and establish a lasting republic. He was considered to be a good leader and one of the best Presidents of the United States, knowing that he had to deal with two factions inside his cabinet: Federalists and Antifederalists. So he had to lead respecting different opinions and points of view that frequently seriously opposed each other.

8 0

2 years ago

Though eventually overturned by an act of Congress, this Supreme Court decision in 2007 was seen as a blow against employees in

rusak2 [61]

Answer: b. Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.

Explanation:

In the case of Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co in 2007, the US Supreme Court ruled that if claims were based on decisions taken by the employer 180 days ago or more, then the employers CANNOT be sued under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 over race or gender pay discrimination.

Plaintiff's were still however allowed to sue under other laws such as the Equal Pay Act which has a 3 year deadline for most sex discrimination claims.

Congress later reversed this ruling in 2009 with the passing of the LILLY LEDBETTER FAIR PAY ACT.

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

14) In what period of Georgia history would these products have been MOST likely to have been profitable? -wheat -rice -indigo -

daser333 [38]

1- Great Depression- wheat or rice
2- Colonial period- indigo
3- Reconstruction Era- Tobacco
4- Silk- Post-World War II

Take these answers with a grain of salt. I am doing my best. But it has been a little while since I took that class.

4 0

2 years ago

What features of the land make China culture easier to attack

Stels [109]

Its very open plains land and not sorounded by any mountains

7 0

3 years ago

Which statement describes the Supreme Court's decision in the Brown v. Board of Education case?

goldenfox [79]

The statement that best describes the Supreme Court's decision in the Brown v. Board of Education case is that it declared the segregated public schools were unconstitutional. It was Board of Education in Topeka, Kansas that lost the case. The correct answer will be D.

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers