<span>The original cost of protein bar = $2.50
The increased cost of protein bar = $2.80
Therefore, the increase in price of the protein bar = $2.80-$2.50
=$0.30
percentage increase = (Difference in price / Original price) x 100
=(0.30/2.50)x100
=(3/25)x100
=3 x 4
=12%</span>
Answer:
The principle in Law 'Nemo dat quod non habet' states that an individual connot give what he does not have
Indeed Tom can rescind the contract with Matthew as he possesses voidable title to the balls
Explanation:
Until consideration has moved from Matthew to Tom the validity of the agreement/Contract remains inconclusive.
Considering his Account is not funded means he has no valid title to the Balls, he is merely in possession of the Balls but not the Owner.
Tom can sue demanding a return of the Balls irrespective of Matthew having sold them to Aaron.
Another illustration could be given of a thief who sells off a property. Inspite of the Buyer being unaware, because the thief has a voidable title it makes the transaction invalid.
Answer:
true is the correct answer right
<h2>Hello!</h2>
The answer is C. Coercive.
<h2>
Why?</h2>
According to the bases of power, coercive power means that someone can punish someone who deserves it when it's needed, punishment can be just punishment but it can also mean serious actions as demoting, restricting privileges or in the last instance, firing people.
Coercive power can be a problem if it's applied to everyone, every time, the result of coercive actions applied in an inappropriate way could result in useful people resignations. That's why coercive tools are the last resort if corrections are needed.
Have a nice day!
Answer:
3 years
Explanation:
Since the income tax is ignored, so the operating cash flows would be
= EBIT + Depreciation - Income tax expense
= $105,000 + $45,000 - $0
= $150,000
The operating cash flows are same for ten years
And, the initial investment is $450,000
So, the payback period would be
= Initial investment ÷ Net cash flows
= $450,000 ÷ $150,000
= 3 years