In some instances, Federal officials expedited the naming process by furnishing the names themselves, and invariably the name would be the same as that of the freedman’s most recent master. But these appear to have been exceptional cases; the ex-slaves themselves usually took the initiative—like the Virginia mother who changed the name of her son from Jeff Davis, which was how the master had known him, to Thomas Grant, which seemed to suggest the freedom she was now exercising. Whatever names the freed slaves adopted, whether that of a previous master, a national leader, an occupational skill, a place of residence, or a color, they were most often making that decision themselves. That was what mattered.
Good Morning!
<span>Nazis discriminated against Jews.
</span>
Among the similarities of Nazi and other measures to the Jews of his day is the idea that the Jews were inferior, or because of their ethnicity, or working with a loan, making a profit. Since before the Middle Ages this prejudice has recurred.
The correct answer is B. Civil rights guarantee equal treatment under the law for all citizens
They are not exactly the same and they certainly cannot list all non-criminal behavior since there are so many things that can be done and are not crime, yet seem like it. Liberties don't state what cannot be done.
Based on my information, I believe that the higher authorities that would choose the prime ministers would actually be the "house of commons". Going back a few years, many of the "house of commons" actually did not have the responsibility in order to do this, but then, the government figured that it would be better if they were to handle on this responsibility.
I believe the answer is: Family finances and household affairs
In the tang and Song society, the women role were even more traditional compared to traditional western countries. They can only have their say regarding the operation of the household , such as budget for daily shoppings, taking care of kids, and educating the kids.
