Answer:C. When the item demand is constant
Explanation:
MRP means material requirement planning it shows when materials needs to be replenish for inventory production, so that inventory is only produced as at when needed.
A constant demand will help to determine perfectly when material is needed.
Answer:
-5.14 for sam
-18.01% for dave
Explanation:
We first calculate for Sam
R = 7.3%
We have 2% increase
= 9.3%
We calculate for present value of coupon and present value at maturity using the formula for present value in the attachment
To get C
1000 x 0.073/2
= 36.5
time= 3 years x 2 times payment = 6
Ytm = rate = 9.3%/2 = 0.0465
Putting values into the formula
36.5[1-(1+0.0465)^-6/0.0465]
= 36.5(1-0.7613/0.0465)
36.5(0.2385/0.0465)
= 36.5 x 5.129
Present value of coupon = 187.20
We solve for maturity
M = 1000
T = 6 months
R = 0.0465
1000/(1+0.0465)⁶
= 1000/1.3135
Present value = 761.32
We add up the value of present value at maturity and that at coupon
761.32 + 187.20
= $948.52
Change in % = 948.52/1000 - 1
= -0.05148
= -5.14 for sam
We calculate for Dave
He has 20 years and payment is two times yearly
= 20x2 = 40
36.5 [1-(1+0.0465)^-40/0.0465]
Present value = 36.5 x 18.014
= 657.511
At maturity,
Present value = 1000/(1+0.0465)⁴⁰
= 1000/6.1598
= 162.34
We add up these present values
= 657.511+162.34 = $819.851
Change = 819.851/1000 -1
= -0.1801
= -18.01%
Answer:
The boss is correct.
Explanation:
Under Sarbanes-Oxley Act, a rules-based approach to corporate governance and reporting is used. It is based on the view that companies must be
required by law (or by some other form of compulsory regulation) to comply with established principles of good corporate governance.
Except in the instances of exceptions provided in the act, company has no choice than to comply regardless of the cost implication because non-compliance is punishable under the act. Sometimes, it is called tick box approach
This is contrary to what is obtainable in a principled-based approach where allowance is given for explanation in the event of possible con-compliance.
Thank you for posting you question here at brainly. I think the statement "<span>Consumers have certain rights that do not carry corresponding responsibilities." is false. Below are the right of the consumer:
</span><span>
<span><span>
<span>
Right to Safety</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Responsibility of Right to Safety</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Right to Be Informed</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Responsibility of Right to Be Informed</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Right to Choose</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Responsibility of Right to Choose</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Right to Be Heard</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Responsibility of Right to Be Heard</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Right to Redress</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Responsibility of Right to Redress</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Right to Consumer Education</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Responsibility of Right to Consumer
Education</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Right to Healthy Environment</span>
</span>
<span>
<span>
Responsibility of Right to Healthy
Environment</span>
</span></span></span>
None of those presentation methods solve problems
